Entitlements,
as they are often referred to in rhetoric-based political circles, are often a
foundational argument for the unfairness of social redistribution programs by
the privileged against the non-privileged in our political domain. This, some argue alternatively, is nothing
more than racism and the undermining of minority health by the privileged. So which is it? The disadvantages of race in our society is
identified in Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic’s book entitled Critical Race Theory, in their
discussion on the subject of minority health.
They say, “People of color lead shorter lives, receive worse medical
care…” and goes on to express the inherent racism in the capitalist system of
privilege.
The
Affordable Care Act is, in a sense, an entitlement program since lower income
persons receive subsidies from the government to buy into the private insurance
system. However, if this were true,
minorities would at least benefit equally, right? According to the Atlantic magazine article
entitled, “Rich,
White, Healthy People Are Most Likely to Hate Obamacare”, that is further
subtitled, “And people who benefit from the law are more likely to view it
negatively than positively”, suggests in part that those who benefit most from
the medical insurance bill are those who are the privileged in our society, and
less so for those of minority status.
This doesn't surprise me as the healthcare system in the states is fundamentally for the benefit of the majority. Take the BMI (body mass index) which is a generalized scale that evaluates whether a person is underweight, of normal weight, overweight, or obese. This is based on a white, middle class standard which puts most white people at the underweight or normal weight ranges and most African Americans and Latinos in the overweight and obesity range. Insurance companies use the BMI as a factor in determining insurance premium rates and guess who pays more... Those with the higher BMI.
ReplyDelete